The one mentioned in the film by Clint Eastwood is not death, or rather the image, often very bloody, death that is served for breakfast, lunch and dinner programs TV: Eastwood depicts the daily death, or the absurdity of life in the tragedy that suddenly disrupts the vagaries of fate that eventually crosses the streets of all.
The three main characters, albeit in different ways, are directly affected by the experience of death, they speak a language incomprehensible to those around them, receding into the category of fools, losers, misfits. The point is that the experience of death imposed on them other priorities, other times: their outlook on life changes, the perspective changes radically.
Despite the title, is actually Hereafter a very human film, much land - the way the eyes of its characters Eastwood is always full of a profound, impartial empathy - and if you want to talk of morality, the message seems to be that integrate an awareness of purpose in our lives makes us better individuals.
A film without a doubt very moving and very nice, although not perfect. A film divided in two, I would say, with a first time convincing realism and emotional tension and a second time going to dissolve gradually in the obvious risk sentimentality.
should be noted that pull the strings of a plot - here we have three parallel stories that at one point going to intersect - is a difficult task that requires refined good taste and imagination to the limit of the visionary (from this point of view I believe that the result of collaboration between film products Guillermo Arriaga and Alejandro Iñárritu are unsurpassed at the time). Probably the steps lame lurking in the script of the film: in fact the highlight of the plot seems a bit 'patched up and the ending loses the rhythm. And perhaps another actor instead of Matt Damon's character would have been able to give George a bit 'of healthy concern.
0 comments:
Post a Comment